SQUIRE IT™Our position
Squire’s Constitution, protocols, and receipts describe how the platform is intended to govern its work. They are not a regulatory approval or a substitute for an organization’s obligations. No independent compliance assessment is established by this website.
United States · Claims must hold up
The FTC requires advertising to be truthful, nondeceptive, and supported by evidence. For Squire, that means measuring a defined workflow before claiming accuracy, fraud prevention, savings, or professional equivalence. A founder’s experience is not a general performance benchmark. FTC advertising guidance.
European Union · Start with the use case
The AI Act takes a risk-based approach. Duties depend on the system’s role and intended use; provider, deployer, and general-purpose model obligations are distinct. A review tool does not automatically confer compliance on the system it reviews. An EU launch needs a scoped assessment against the applicable rules and transition dates. European Commission AI Act overview.
NIST · A useful framework, not a seal of approval
The AI Risk Management Framework is voluntary. It can inform risk-management work, but citing it does not make Squire NIST-certified. Any future mapping should identify the implemented control, evidence, owner, and remaining gap. NIST AI RMF.
Before a regulated deployment
Define the workflow and responsible humans; assess the data and permissions; validate the actual configuration; document limitations, retention, escalation, and incident handling; then obtain the necessary contractual and legal review. Healthcare, legal, and financial workflows require their own assessment. See industry use cases.
What we are not claiming
This draft does not establish SOC 2 assurance, ISO certification, HIPAA compliance, GDPR compliance, or AI Act conformity. Publish such claims only with evidence that identifies the entity, service, scope, and date.
If it matters, Squire it.
Explore the demonstrations ↗